fuckyeahtng:

[x] Jonathan Frakes and Marina Sirtis pitch their idea for a sitcom, The Rikers in Space.

elijahelegia:

newsketches:

2007excalibur2007:

rapidbeta:

egobus:

omg my little brother was using my computer and look at his search history

image

so embarrassing

"sonic with boobies"

sonic fanfiction

Sexy anime girls with boobs

did anyone read the whole list

I got into the closed beta for chaos heroes online i was expecting japanese dota or league instead i got something that played like a shitty korean rip off game pile of horse shit it was Strife is better than it is and Strife is made of cuteness and legos.

kaji04:

"My stand, ECHO CORRUPTION, is UNDEFEATABLE"

kaji04:

"My stand, ECHO CORRUPTION, is UNDEFEATABLE"

adriofthedead:

ochingelion:

end-of-pizza:

NO JUST FUCKIN NO!

OH WOW 

wow i can’t believe nge is a rip off of animaniacs

adriofthedead:

ochingelion:

end-of-pizza:

NO JUST FUCKIN NO!

OH WOW 

wow i can’t believe nge is a rip off of animaniacs

george-the-slut:

I AM LAUGHING SO HARD IT HURTS

george-the-slut:

I AM LAUGHING SO HARD IT HURTS

cat meowing at the japanese xbox one launch
hokuto-ju-no-ken:

notallfeminists:

kaon4shi:

vladimirnootin:


 The legal problem for Sarkeesian is that fundraising through public deceit is against the law in America, as Mike from Danger & Play helpfully pointed out. [donotlink article]

omg

Article doesn’t explain under what “false pretenses” she raised her project funds. She asks people to back her project, and she’s doing the project. She hasn’t lied about what she’s spending donated funds on. Claiming to have received threats (I personally believe her but that’s beside the point) has nothing to do with it. If she lied, that would be manipulative but in no way illegal. 

"She asks people to back her project, and she’s doing the project." She was going to deliver 12 video’s by December 2012. It’s now September 2014, how many video’s did she make? 4? 5?
"She hasn’t lied about what she’s spending donated funds on." She asked for 6.000 dollars for her project. She got 26 times her asking amount. That’s 152.922 dollars, for those 12 video’s that were supposed to be done and delivered by December 2012. She hasn’t said one word on where all that money went.
"Claiming to received threats has nothing to do with it." Actually it has. If you claim to have received threats to gain attention for your video’s and to raise money (because we all know she doesn’t have enough money!), and those threats turn out to be fabricated, that’s a felony. It’s called ‘fundraising through public deceit’. That’s was that article was about.
Don’t defend someone like Anita Sarkeesian without doing research.

Yeah, it’s very important to note that the recent harassment she claims to have received and the news stories about it came right after she opened donations back up for FemFreq since she got nonprofit status now. (Also, she lied about being nonprofit for the longest time)
What makes the recent harassment, or rather, the harassment she showed as being what scared her so much, has a lot of questionable elements. Her address is public record as she’s published it on her website before. The account that made the threat was created just before the threats were made. etc etc you all know the story.
You can argue she hasn’t “lied” about where the money is going but she has, without a doubt, remained silent and unresponsive about where it’s going and what it’s being spent on.
I’ve even e-mailed FemFreq/Anita as a donator of the original TvW kickstarter and as a concerned citizen about it. I explained that I’ve had a lot of negative experiences with Non Profit organizations and that I feel, as someone who has donated, I feel it’s important that there be some transparency about what the money is being spent on since there is a LOT of room for people to abuse non profit status for personal gain.

hokuto-ju-no-ken:

notallfeminists:

kaon4shi:

vladimirnootin:

 The legal problem for Sarkeesian is that fundraising through public deceit is against the law in America, as Mike from Danger & Play helpfully pointed out. [donotlink article]

omg

Article doesn’t explain under what “false pretenses” she raised her project funds. She asks people to back her project, and she’s doing the project. She hasn’t lied about what she’s spending donated funds on. Claiming to have received threats (I personally believe her but that’s beside the point) has nothing to do with it. If she lied, that would be manipulative but in no way illegal. 

"She asks people to back her project, and she’s doing the project." She was going to deliver 12 video’s by December 2012. It’s now September 2014, how many video’s did she make? 4? 5?

"She hasn’t lied about what she’s spending donated funds on." She asked for 6.000 dollars for her project. She got 26 times her asking amount. That’s 152.922 dollars, for those 12 video’s that were supposed to be done and delivered by December 2012. She hasn’t said one word on where all that money went.

"Claiming to received threats has nothing to do with it." Actually it has. If you claim to have received threats to gain attention for your video’s and to raise money (because we all know she doesn’t have enough money!), and those threats turn out to be fabricated, that’s a felony. It’s called ‘fundraising through public deceit’. That’s was that article was about.

Don’t defend someone like Anita Sarkeesian without doing research.

Yeah, it’s very important to note that the recent harassment she claims to have received and the news stories about it came right after she opened donations back up for FemFreq since she got nonprofit status now. (Also, she lied about being nonprofit for the longest time)

What makes the recent harassment, or rather, the harassment she showed as being what scared her so much, has a lot of questionable elements. Her address is public record as she’s published it on her website before. The account that made the threat was created just before the threats were made. etc etc you all know the story.

You can argue she hasn’t “lied” about where the money is going but she has, without a doubt, remained silent and unresponsive about where it’s going and what it’s being spent on.

I’ve even e-mailed FemFreq/Anita as a donator of the original TvW kickstarter and as a concerned citizen about it. I explained that I’ve had a lot of negative experiences with Non Profit organizations and that I feel, as someone who has donated, I feel it’s important that there be some transparency about what the money is being spent on since there is a LOT of room for people to abuse non profit status for personal gain.